↓ Skip to main content

Trion fine structure and coupled spin–valley dynamics in monolayer tungsten disulfide

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Trion fine structure and coupled spin–valley dynamics in monolayer tungsten disulfide
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Plechinger, Philipp Nagler, Ashish Arora, Robert Schmidt, Alexey Chernikov, Andrés Granados del Águila, Peter C.M. Christianen, Rudolf Bratschitsch, Christian Schüller, Tobias Korn

Abstract

Monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides have recently emerged as possible candidates for valleytronic applications, as the spin and valley pseudospin are directly coupled and stabilized by a large spin splitting. The optical properties of these two-dimensional crystals are dominated by tightly bound electron-hole pairs (excitons) and more complex quasiparticles such as charged excitons (trions). Here we investigate monolayer WS2 samples via photoluminescence and time-resolved Kerr rotation. In photoluminescence and in energy-dependent Kerr rotation measurements, we are able to resolve two different trion states, which we interpret as intravalley and intervalley trions. Using time-resolved Kerr rotation, we observe a rapid initial valley polarization decay for the A exciton and the trion states. Subsequently, we observe a crossover towards exciton-exciton interaction-related dynamics, consistent with the formation and decay of optically dark A excitons. By contrast, resonant excitation of the B exciton transition leads to a very slow decay of the Kerr signal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 256 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 34%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 58 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 113 44%
Materials Science 38 15%
Engineering 17 7%
Chemistry 17 7%
Chemical Engineering 3 1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,469,995
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#44,249
of 47,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,983
of 337,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#801
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.