↓ Skip to main content

Ellipsometric determination of permittivity in a negative index photonic crystal metamaterial

Overview of attention for article published in Light: Science & Applications, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ellipsometric determination of permittivity in a negative index photonic crystal metamaterial
Published in
Light: Science & Applications, December 2012
DOI 10.1038/lsa.2012.42
Authors

Principia Dardano, Massimo Gagliardi, Ivo Rendina, Stefano Cabrini, Vito Mocella

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 34%
Materials Science 7 24%
Engineering 7 24%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#11,084,361
of 12,466,342 outputs
Outputs from Light: Science & Applications
#368
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,002
of 259,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Light: Science & Applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,466,342 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.