| Title |
Acinar cell clonal expansion in pancreas homeostasis and carcinogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03916-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Neuhöfer, Caitlin M. Roake, Stewart J. Kim, Ryan J. Lu, Robert B. West, Gregory W. Charville, Steven E. Artandi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 42% |
| Canada | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 41 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 29 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#835,810
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,425
of 98,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,716
of 436,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#558
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.