↓ Skip to main content

Vast CO2 release from Australian fires in 2019–2020 constrained by satellite

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
94 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Vast CO2 release from Australian fires in 2019–2020 constrained by satellite
Published in
Nature, September 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03712-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivar R. van der Velde, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Houweling, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Tobias Borsdorff, Jochen Landgraf, Paul Tol, Tim A. van Kempen, Richard van Hees, Ruud Hoogeveen, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Ilse Aben

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Engineering 4 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 56 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#70,818
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,350
of 98,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,117
of 434,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#162
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.