| Title |
Resurgence of Ebola virus in 2021 in Guinea suggests a new paradigm for outbreaks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03901-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alpha Kabinet Keita, Fara R. Koundouno, Martin Faye, Ariane Düx, Julia Hinzmann, Haby Diallo, Ahidjo Ayouba, Frederic Le Marcis, Barré Soropogui, Kékoura Ifono, Moussa M. Diagne, Mamadou S. Sow, Joseph A. Bore, Sebastien Calvignac-Spencer, Nicole Vidal, Jacob Camara, Mamadou B. Keita, Annick Renevey, Amadou Diallo, Abdoul K. Soumah, Saa L. Millimono, Almudena Mari-Saez, Mamadou Diop, Ahmadou Doré, Fodé Y. Soumah, Kaka Kourouma, Nathalie J. Vielle, Cheikh Loucoubar, Ibrahima Camara, Karifa Kourouma, Giuditta Annibaldis, Assaïtou Bah, Anke Thielebein, Meike Pahlmann, Steven T. Pullan, Miles W. Carroll, Joshua Quick, Pierre Formenty, Anais Legand, Karla Pietro, Michael R. Wiley, Noel Tordo, Christophe Peyrefitte, John T. McCrone, Andrew Rambaut, Youssouf Sidibé, Mamadou D. Barry, Madeleine Kourouma, Cé D. Saouromou, Mamadou Condé, Moussa Baldé, Moriba Povogui, Sakoba Keita, Mandiou Diakite, Mamadou S. Bah, Amadou Sidibe, Dembo Diakite, Fodé B. Sako, Fodé A. Traore, Georges A. Ki-Zerbo, Philippe Lemey, Stephan Günther, Liana E. Kafetzopoulou, Amadou A. Sall, Eric Delaporte, Sophie Duraffour, Ousmane Faye, Fabian H. Leendertz, Martine Peeters, Abdoulaye Toure, N’. Faly Magassouba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 789 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 89 | 11% |
| United States | 84 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 4% |
| Germany | 31 | 4% |
| France | 24 | 3% |
| Spain | 15 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| Japan | 8 | 1% |
| Guinea | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 78 | 10% |
| Unknown | 411 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 643 | 81% |
| Scientists | 104 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 80 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1004. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,548
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,649
of 99,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#644
of 437,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#64
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.