| Title |
Environmental performance of blue foods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03889-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica A. Gephart, Patrik J. G. Henriksson, Robert W. R. Parker, Alon Shepon, Kelvin D. Gorospe, Kristina Bergman, Gidon Eshel, Christopher D. Golden, Benjamin S. Halpern, Sara Hornborg, Malin Jonell, Marc Metian, Kathleen Mifflin, Richard Newton, Peter Tyedmers, Wenbo Zhang, Friederike Ziegler, Max Troell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 6% |
| Sweden | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 69% |
| Scientists | 34 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 535 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 15% |
| Unknown | 211 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 85 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 74 | 14% |
| Unknown | 248 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 489. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#54,737
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,418
of 98,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,696
of 436,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#134
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.