| Title |
The COVID-19 pandemic as a pivot point for biological conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-021-25399-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda E. Bates, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Celene B. Milanés, Ku’ulei Rodgers, Valeria Vergara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Colombia | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 5 | 10% |
| Fiji | 4 | 8% |
| Panama | 3 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 4% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 67% |
| Scientists | 14 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#804,874
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#13,571
of 58,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,198
of 436,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#372
of 1,623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.