↓ Skip to main content

Best practice for protecting pollinators

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Best practice for protecting pollinators
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01531-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dino J. Martins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Mathematics 2 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,770,296
of 19,529,814 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,236
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,841
of 280,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#36
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,529,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 155.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.