↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Solving Quantum Ground-State Problems with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Erratum: Solving Quantum Ground-State Problems with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00911
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhaokai Li, Man-Hong Yung, Hongwei Chen, Dawei Lu, James D. Whitfield, Xinhua Peng, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Jiangfeng Du

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Chemistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,208,681
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#76,593
of 122,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,253
of 277,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#223
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.