↓ Skip to main content

Kea (Nestor notabilis) fail a loose-string connectivity task

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Kea (Nestor notabilis) fail a loose-string connectivity task
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-94879-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amalia P. M. Bastos, Patrick M. Wood, Alex H. Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,435,874
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#13,764
of 125,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,622
of 434,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#374
of 3,866 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,866 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.