↓ Skip to main content

Editorial procedures reviewed

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Editorial procedures reviewed
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, July 2003
DOI 10.1038/ncb0703-583
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#3,320
of 3,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,171
of 49,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.