| Title |
Treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from the Connect® MM Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood Cancer Journal, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41408-021-00524-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans C. Lee, Sikander Ailawadhi, Cristina J. Gasparetto, Sundar Jagannath, Robert M. Rifkin, Brian G. M. Durie, Mohit Narang, Howard R. Terebelo, Kathleen Toomey, James W. Hardin, Lynne Wagner, James L. Omel, Mazaher Dhalla, Liang Liu, Prashant Joshi, Rafat Abonour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 43% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,111,728
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Journal
#353
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,777
of 430,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Journal
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.