↓ Skip to main content

Clonal dynamics following p53 loss of heterozygosity in Kras-driven cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Clonal dynamics following p53 loss of heterozygosity in Kras-driven cancers
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12685
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandar Deepak Muzumdar, Kimberly Judith Dorans, Katherine Minjee Chung, Rebecca Robbins, Tuomas Tammela, Vasilena Gocheva, Carman Man-Chung Li, Tyler Jacks

Abstract

Although it has become increasingly clear that cancers display extensive cellular heterogeneity, the spatial growth dynamics of genetically distinct clones within developing solid tumours remain poorly understood. Here we leverage mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) to trace subclonal populations retaining or lacking p53 within oncogenic Kras-initiated lung and pancreatic tumours. In both models, p53 constrains progression to advanced adenocarcinomas. Comparison of lineage-related p53 knockout and wild-type clones reveals a minor role of p53 in suppressing cell expansion in lung adenomas. In contrast, p53 loss promotes both the initiation and expansion of low-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs), likely through differential expression of the p53 regulator p19ARF. Strikingly, lineage-related cells are often dispersed in lung adenomas and PanINs, contrasting with more contiguous growth of advanced subclones. Together, these results support cancer type-specific suppressive roles of p53 in early tumour progression and offer insights into clonal growth patterns during tumour development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,445,856
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,358
of 58,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,587
of 349,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#342
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.