| Title |
Tonic prime-boost of STING signalling mediates Niemann–Pick disease type C
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03762-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting-Ting Chu, Xintao Tu, Kun Yang, Jianjun Wu, Joyce J. Repa, Nan Yan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 30% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 53% |
| Scientists | 47 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#297,681
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,142
of 98,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,069
of 448,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#318
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.