| Title |
EGFR activation limits the response of liver cancer to lenvatinib
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03741-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haojie Jin, Yaoping Shi, Yuanyuan Lv, Shengxian Yuan, Christel F. A. Ramirez, Cor Lieftink, Liqin Wang, Siying Wang, Cun Wang, Matheus Henrique Dias, Fleur Jochems, Yuan Yang, Astrid Bosma, E. Marielle Hijmans, Marnix H. P. de Groot, Serena Vegna, Dan Cui, Yangyang Zhou, Jing Ling, Hui Wang, Yuchen Guo, Xingling Zheng, Nikita Isima, Haiqiu Wu, Chong Sun, Roderick L. Beijersbergen, Leila Akkari, Weiping Zhou, Bo Zhai, Wenxin Qin, René Bernards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 7% |
| Japan | 8 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 54% |
| Scientists | 55 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#323,075
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#17,114
of 98,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,692
of 447,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#335
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.