| Title |
Free-electron lasing at 27 nanometres based on a laser wakefield accelerator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03678-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wentao Wang, Ke Feng, Lintong Ke, Changhai Yu, Yi Xu, Rong Qi, Yu Chen, Zhiyong Qin, Zhijun Zhang, Ming Fang, Jiaqi Liu, Kangnan Jiang, Hao Wang, Cheng Wang, Xiaojun Yang, Fenxiang Wu, Yuxin Leng, Jiansheng Liu, Ruxin Li, Zhizhan Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 78 | 57% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#185,279
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,217
of 98,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,343
of 447,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#257
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.