| Title |
Feasibility of quantification of the distribution of blood flow in the normal human fetal circulation using CMR: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike Seed, Joshua F P van Amerom, Shi-Joon Yoo, Bahiyah Al Nafisi, Lars Grosse-Wortmann, Edgar Jaeggi, Michael S Jansz, Christopher K Macgowan |
| Abstract |
We present the first phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements of the distribution of blood flow in twelve late gestation human fetuses. These were obtained using a retrospective gating technique known as metric optimised gating (MOG). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 53% |
| Engineering | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#16,967,134
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,061
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,957
of 287,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.