| Title |
Rwanda: From killing fields to technopolis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/537s4a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Nordling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 23% |
| Rwanda | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 85% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 28% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#909,947
of 24,271,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#30,126
of 94,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,650
of 343,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#585
of 986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,271,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.