↓ Skip to main content

Reply to 'Tree rings and volcanic cooling'

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reply to 'Tree rings and volcanic cooling'
Published in
Nature Geoscience, November 2012
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1646
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Jose D. Fuentes, Scott Rutherford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,539,302
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,732
of 3,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,305
of 285,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#23
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.