↓ Skip to main content

Reply to: Reinterpretation of purported molting evidence in the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx

Overview of attention for article published in Communications Biology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Reply to: Reinterpretation of purported molting evidence in the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx
Published in
Communications Biology, July 2021
DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02367-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G. Kaye, Michael Pittman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,194,346
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#917
of 5,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,752
of 452,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#59
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.