Title |
Red and processed meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/ejcn.2012.180 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G-C Chen, D-B Lv, Z Pang, Q-F Liu |
Abstract |
Epidemiological evidence is suggestive, but inconclusive, for an association between consumption of red and processed meat and risk of stroke. We aimed to assess this association by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 15% |
Spain | 7 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | 2% |
Georgia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 23% |
Scientists | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 187 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 17% |
Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 61 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#489,765
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#185
of 4,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,215
of 285,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.