↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for intensive care unit admission in patients with severe leptospirosis: a comparative study according to patients’ severity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for intensive care unit admission in patients with severe leptospirosis: a comparative study according to patients’ severity
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1349-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth De Francesco Daher, Douglas Sousa Soares, Anna Tereza Bezerra de Menezes Fernandes, Marília Maria Vasconcelos Girão, Pedro Randal Sidrim, Eanes Delgado Barros Pereira, Natalia Albuquerque Rocha, Geraldo Bezerra da Silva

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate predictive factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission among patients with severe leptospirosis. This is a retrospective study with all patients with severe leptospirosis admitted to a tertiary hospital. Patients were divided in ICU and ward groups. Demographical, clinical and laboratory data of the groups were compared as well as acute kidney injury (AKI) severity, according to the RIFLE criteria (R = Risk, I = Injury, F = Failure, L = Loss, E = End-stage kidney disease). A total of 206 patients were included, 83 admitted to ICU and 123 to ward. Mean age was 36 ± 15.8 years, with 85.9 % males. Patients in ICU group were older (38.8 ± 15.7 vs. 34.16 ± 15.9 years, p = 0.037), had a shorter hospital stay (4.13 ± 3.1 vs. 9.5 ± 5.2 days, p = 0.0001), lower levels of hematocrit (29.6 ± 6.4 vs. 33.1 ± 8.6 %, p = 0.003), hemoglobin (10.2 ± 2.4 vs. 11.6 ± 1.9 g/dL, p < 0.0001), and platelets (94,427 ± 86,743 vs. 128,896 ± 137,017/mm(3), p = 0.035), as well as higher levels of bilirubin (15.0 ± 12.2 vs. 8.6 ± 9.5 mg/dL, p = 0.001). ICU group also had a higher frequency of severe AKI (RIFLE-"Failure": 73.2 % vs. 54.2 %, p < 0.0001) and a higher prevalence of dialysis requirement (57.3 % vs. 27.6 %, p < 0.0001). Mortality was higher among ICU patients (23.5 % vs. 5.7 %, p < 0.0001). Independent predictors for ICU admission were tachypnea (p = 0.027, OR = 13, CI = 1.3-132), hypotension (p = 0.009, OR = 5.27, CI = 1.5-18) and AKI (p = 0.029, OR = 14, CI = 1.3-150). Ceftriaxone use was a protective factor (p = 0.001, OR = 0.13, CI = 0.04-0.4). Independent risk factors for ICU admission in leptospirosis include tachypnea, hypotension and AKI. Ceftriaxone was a protective factor for ICU admission, suggesting that its use may prevent severe forms of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 37%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,812,737
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,126
of 7,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,839
of 397,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#74
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.