| Title |
Atomic force microscopy analysis of native infectious and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-91371-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sébastien Lyonnais, Mathilde Hénaut, Aymeric Neyret, Peggy Merida, Chantal Cazevieille, Nathalie Gros, Christine Chable-Bessia, Delphine Muriaux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 30 | 23% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 84% |
| Scientists | 17 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#540,134
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,951
of 142,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,846
of 461,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#191
of 4,431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.