| Title |
Perspectives on disparities in scientific visibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Materials, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41578-021-00329-5 |
| Authors |
Tejal A. Desai, Omolola Eniola-Adefeso, Kelly R. Stevens, Maribel Vazquez, Princess Imoukhuede |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 54% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 63 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 36 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 4 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#671,146
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#52
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,206
of 461,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.