| Title |
Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. G. E. Gomes, C. A. Toth, H. J. Cole, C. D. Francis, J. R. Barber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 54% |
| Scientists | 22 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#225,800
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,259
of 58,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,550
of 461,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#150
of 1,997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.