| Title |
Superconducting electrons go missing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/536282a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Zaanen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 12% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 26% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,593,092
of 24,778,793 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,733
of 95,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,514
of 350,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#689
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,778,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.