↓ Skip to main content

Tissue context determines the penetrance of regulatory DNA variation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Tissue context determines the penetrance of regulatory DNA variation
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23139-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica M. Halow, Rachel Byron, Megan S. Hogan, Raquel Ordoñez, Mark Groudine, M. A. Bender, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Matthew T. Maurano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,757,388
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,264
of 37,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,730
of 337,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them