↓ Skip to main content

Distinguishing active from quiescent disease in ANCA-associated vasculitis using attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Distinguishing active from quiescent disease in ANCA-associated vasculitis using attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-89344-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D. Morris, Camilo L. M. Morais, Kássio M. G. Lima, Daniel L. D. Freitas, Mark E. Brady, Ajay P. Dhaygude, Anthony W. Rowbottom, Francis L. Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 14 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Unspecified 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,959,351
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#25,336
of 125,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,144
of 440,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#859
of 4,503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.