| Title |
Skeletal editing through direct nitrogen deletion of secondary amines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03448-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean H. Kennedy, Balu D. Dherange, Kathleen J. Berger, Mark D. Levin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 290 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 88 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 7% |
| India | 11 | 4% |
| Japan | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 110 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 185 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 99 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 338 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 26% |
| Researcher | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 95 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 210 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 98 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#124,373
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,216
of 98,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,701
of 456,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#216
of 912 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 912 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.