| Title |
COVID-19 and the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer: an evidence-based review and commentary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-021-01361-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Round, Veline L’Esperance, Joanne Bayly, Kate Brain, Lorraine Dallas, John G. Edwards, Thomas Haswell, Crispin Hiley, Natasha Lovell, Julia McAdam, Grace McCutchan, Arjun Nair, Thomas Newsom-Davis, Elizabeth K. Sage, Neal Navani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 43% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 30% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,417,630
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#569
of 10,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 433,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#8
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.