↓ Skip to main content

Leukemia stemness and co-occurring mutations drive resistance to IDH inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Leukemia stemness and co-occurring mutations drive resistance to IDH inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22874-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Wang, Kiyomi Morita, Courtney D. DiNardo, Ken Furudate, Tomoyuki Tanaka, Yuanqing Yan, Keyur P. Patel, Kyle J. MacBeth, Bin Wu, Guowen Liu, Mark Frattini, Jairo A. Matthews, Latasha D. Little, Curtis Gumbs, Xingzhi Song, Jianhua Zhang, Erika J. Thompson, Tapan M. Kadia, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Elias Jabbour, Farhad Ravandi, Kapil N. Bhalla, Marina Konopleva, Hagop M. Kantarjian, P. Andrew Futreal, Koichi Takahashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 31 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,402,793
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,799
of 57,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,383
of 454,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,151
of 1,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.