| Title |
A lysine–cysteine redox switch with an NOS bridge regulates enzyme function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03513-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Wensien, Fabian Rabe von Pappenheim, Lisa-Marie Funk, Patrick Kloskowski, Ute Curth, Ulf Diederichsen, Jon Uranga, Jin Ye, Pan Fang, Kuan-Ting Pan, Henning Urlaub, Ricardo A. Mata, Viktor Sautner, Kai Tittmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 374 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 11% |
| Japan | 30 | 8% |
| Germany | 29 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 7% |
| France | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 163 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 230 | 61% |
| Scientists | 136 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 102 | 34% |
| Chemistry | 69 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 346. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#96,933
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,723
of 99,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,962
of 457,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#179
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.