| Title |
Genome-editing tools storm ahead
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.2220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivien Marx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 73% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,513,403
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,863
of 5,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,141
of 187,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#27
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.