| Title |
The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep00551 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raj Kumar Pan, Sitabhra Sinha, Kimmo Kaski, Jari Saramäki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 69% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 28% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 28 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,175,209
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,816
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,456
of 183,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#27
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.