↓ Skip to main content

Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Yadin, Matteo Fadel, Manuel Gessner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 63%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#335,492
of 18,422,743 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,117
of 36,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,390
of 327,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,422,743 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them