Title |
Different quantification approaches for nitrogen use efficiency lead to divergent estimates with varying advantages
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Food, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1038/s43016-021-00263-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhi Quan, Xin Zhang, Yunting Fang, Eric A. Davidson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 39 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,087,978
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Nature Food
#402
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,908
of 456,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Food
#32
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.