Title |
Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud
|
---|---|
Published by |
Nature Medicine, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1038/nm0806-867a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hepeng Jia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 9% |
Chemistry | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,338,774
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#3,702
of 8,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,473
of 66,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.