| Title |
Measuring the elastic modulus of soft culture surfaces and three-dimensional hydrogels using atomic force microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41596-021-00495-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael D. A. Norman, Silvia A. Ferreira, Geraldine M. Jowett, Laurent Bozec, Eileen Gentleman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 25% |
| United States | 12 | 12% |
| France | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 49 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 48 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2021.
All research outputs
#754,477
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#162
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,360
of 455,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#7
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.