| Title |
Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-87480-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Bogert, Aaron Schecter, Richard T. Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#47,105
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#692
of 141,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,698
of 455,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#22
of 4,735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.