| Title |
Integration of genomic sequencing into the response to the Ebola virus outbreak in Nord Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-021-01302-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eddy Kinganda-Lusamaki, Allison Black, Daniel B. Mukadi, James Hadfield, Placide Mbala-Kingebeni, Catherine B. Pratt, Amuri Aziza, Moussa M. Diagne, Bailey White, Nella Bisento, Bibiche Nsunda, Marceline Akonga, Martin Faye, Ousmane Faye, Francois Edidi-Atani, Meris Matondo-Kuamfumu, Fabrice Mambu-Mbika, Junior Bulabula, Nicholas Di Paola, Matthias G. Pauthner, Kristian G. Andersen, Gustavo Palacios, Eric Delaporte, Amadou Alpha Sall, Martine Peeters, Michael R. Wiley, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke, Trevor Bedford, Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Congo | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 436. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#66,057
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#392
of 9,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,221
of 457,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#29
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.