↓ Skip to main content

Research biotech patenting 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Research biotech patenting 2015
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3646
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brady Huggett, Kathryn Paisner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,986,547
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#7,175
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,026
of 361,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#75
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.