@THutschalik @stephrstephr There was a paper on that! :) https://t.co/nwefkipoXT
@iMakeBADads True indeed. There is research showing that "people systematically overlook subtractive changes." I'm curious, how do you suggest they break this habit? https://t.co/AyCaytC0u6
RT @john_j_brown: https://t.co/JtA9iQXjOK It is very easy to make the mistake of preferring additive changes over subtractive changes in t…
My op-ed (in Norwegian): https://t.co/bEuyvxNdMd The study on how people prefer additive over subtractive changes in problem solving: https://t.co/Lt63ObTUgl The book on "alternative time management", focusing on direction & meaning over speed alone:
Love this. Will def. use in my business model experiments class @LBS. Reminds me of @gabeadams et al’s. superb work on our tendency to ignore subtractive changes. https://t.co/4VB0OvYcS2. 1/
RT @steve_tadelis: Stumbled upon this fascinating article - less can be more! “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one rea…
RT @steve_tadelis: Stumbled upon this fascinating article - less can be more! “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one rea…
Stumbled upon this fascinating article - less can be more! “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate overburdened schedules, institutional red tape, and damaging effects on the planet.” https://t.co/
https://t.co/EL7cE33BIe natureに掲載されたGabrielle Adams、Benjamin Converseの研究によると、 人間はどんなに単純であったり、得する様な行動であっても、「引き算」による改善は好まないみたいです。 それよりも、今あるものに「足し算」をする事での改善策を好む傾向にある様です。
People systematically overlook subtractive changes | Nature https://t.co/722FTgVCRY
@TheAliceSmith @PerBylund the additive bias
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @arjunrajlab: “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate… institutional red tape”:…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
The social cost of subtraction is contradicting the decisions of someone else or onesself who added something the first place. Barrier often higher than simply adding non-sense.
"Less is more." Hands down the best advice I've ever received or given.
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @evolvwing: Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) i…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @arjunrajlab: “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate… institutional red tape”:…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @arjunrajlab: “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate… institutional red tape”:…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @arjunrajlab: “Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate… institutional red tape”:…
“Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate… institutional red tape”: yes! It is easier to try to address problems by adding forms, but removing forms is almost never considered.
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
Ohhh yes, this reminds me ... repression may facilitate trait evolution because a TF (e.g. Bab, which represses UV-scales) is already there. Once co-opted, needs to be locally silenced to de-repress a trait or feature. All substraction = powerful way to ev
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
RT @ItaiYanai: We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTR…
We systematically overlook subtractive changes: With implications for our creative process, we forget it's possible to SUBTRACT components from an object, idea or situation. This was shown beautifully by @Leidyklotz & colleagues in their 2021 Nature pa
心理学:人間は、引くことによる改善を好まない Nature > Adamsたちは、このことが、人々が過密スケジュール、画一的な官僚的形式主義、地球に悪影響を及ぼす事象などの問題の緩和に苦労している理由の1つになっていると結論付けている。 2021年4月8日 https://t.co/TGiHthknku
RT @SteveStuWill: People tend to come up with solutions that add features rather than subtract them, even when the latter would be better.…
In healthcare, our tendency to associate ‘more’ with ‘better’ and our cultural emphasis on tangible contributions make subtracting low-value care harder. We are rife with opportunities to eliminate ineffective or harmful practices #HealthcareQuality https:
@maartenbakkerch @roelof_v @VO_raad En dit is de oorzaak: https://t.co/KQxoHsvJtX
"participants were less likely to identify advantageous subtractive changes when the task did not cue them to consider subtraction" https://t.co/odz1Uw8iO9 'People systematically overlook subtractive changes' / https://t.co/YOO8CfCbUh
5. It's better not to do something than to do it badly or quickly Our default is to add things, even when it's better to remove them, as @GabeAdams and colleagues show: https://t.co/w2OgmOySFo We have to actively work against this and decide whether to s
RT @john_j_brown: https://t.co/JtA9iQXjOK It is very easy to make the mistake of preferring additive changes over subtractive changes in t…
'People systematically overlook subtractive changes' @Nature In seeking to change and improve x (a technology, an argument), people systematically look to add stuff, and do not think as much about subtracting. https://t.co/R4FZ4IaftM
RT @Kuwaiteb: وكما يقول الحكيم لاو تسو To attain knowledge, add things every day. To attain wisdom, subtract things every day المزيد: htt…
وكما يقول الحكيم لاو تسو To attain knowledge, add things every day. To attain wisdom, subtract things every day المزيد: https://t.co/bvubr804dn
RT @SamiSyrjamaki: Tämä vaikuttaa mielenkiintoiselta. People systematically overlook subtractive changes | Nature https://t.co/YgMtDm7u0L
心理学:人間は、引くことによる改善を好まない | Nature | Nature Portfolio https://t.co/F62zGWf6vz
心理学:人間は、引くことによる改善を好まない | Nature | Nature Portfolio 2021年4月8日 https://t.co/fV5Nn5VtA1
RT @BodoWinter: We build on the phenomenal "People systematically overlook subtractive changes" by @GabeAdams and colleagues (2021): https:…
RT @wavyphd: This must be why it's so hard to revise your manuscript: we think of improvement as a process of addition, rather than subtrac…
RT @wavyphd: This must be why it's so hard to revise your manuscript: we think of improvement as a process of addition, rather than subtrac…
This must be why it's so hard to revise your manuscript: we think of improvement as a process of addition, rather than subtraction
RT @BodoWinter: We build on the phenomenal "People systematically overlook subtractive changes" by @GabeAdams and colleagues (2021): https:…
RT @BodoWinter: We build on the phenomenal "People systematically overlook subtractive changes" by @GabeAdams and colleagues (2021): https:…
RT @BodoWinter: We build on the phenomenal "People systematically overlook subtractive changes" by @GabeAdams and colleagues (2021): https:…
We build on the phenomenal "People systematically overlook subtractive changes" by @GabeAdams and colleagues (2021): https://t.co/daHkyAAWlU They show a fundamental behavioral bias where people don't consider opportunities to subtract across a range of ta
『人間が物や考え、状況の改善を求められた時、その要素の一部を引くのではなく、新しい要素を足す傾向がある』 心理学:人間は、引くことによる改善を好まない | Nature | Nature Portfolio https://t.co/hrTBzYsSwT
RT @gecko39: People systematically overlook subtractive changes 07APR2021 https://t.co/Dz84ce14GW go forward & subtract https://t.co/8ID…
RT @gecko39: why subtractive changes require less thought go forward & subtract https://t.co/WkdqW4P0A7
더하는 경향이 디폴트값이기 때문에 빼기 단서가 제시되지 않는 이상 사람들은 보통 뭘 더 더하는 것을 통해 문제를 해결하려 한다고 하네요. https://t.co/sw2YNfgTJ0
“People systematically overlook subtractive changes” in @Nature , people who set out to improve an idea, a product, a situation-- tend to focus on "additive transformations" and ignore "subtractive transformations." https://t.co/91oXdb8la4
Research shows that people tend to add things, and often overlook subtractive changes when improving something. So, what have we been overlooking? What subtractive changes would improve UX teams and processes? https://t.co/AUgsiojCir #ux #uxresearch
@crypto_condom It typically never swings that way. Humans underestimate subtractive changes. https://t.co/KoTOT6rLBf
Nos organisations sont complexes car nous serions victimes d'un biais: nous préférons les solutions qui ajoutent à l'existant (plutôt que que celles qui réduisent ou simplifient!) https://t.co/W2uVO5eKDz
'Second, the effects of bureaucratic psychosis proliferate because people have a predilection to solve problems with addition. ' https://t.co/Y3v72oelHl
RT @arnonymous91: @paulbloomatyale we're systematically biased towards additive strategies for problem solving and neglect subtractive ones…
@paulbloomatyale we're systematically biased towards additive strategies for problem solving and neglect subtractive ones https://t.co/S081ncGyoD
@emollick This is a common anti-pattern for everyone (including you and me), here is the relevant research: https://t.co/PauSTORvtx
#lesscode : time to remove something https://t.co/Q0AdJvjOmN
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
If you are not adding back it means you are not deleting enough
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
@ShorewalkerDMS
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
People tend to add instead of subtract in making changes, which is often an erroneous decision. https://t.co/zExcjzzNQj
Tämä vaikuttaa mielenkiintoiselta. People systematically overlook subtractive changes | Nature https://t.co/YgMtDm7u0L
This is an interesting study, and for me at least the results make intuitive sense. For me, the ever increasing complexity of our management, governance etc. system is a hugely important problem. Perhaps we should add subtractive thinking to our curricu
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
RT @andre_spicer: When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements…
When we think about improving something, we tend to focus on adding features. We systematically overlook how improvements can be made through subtraction. Experimental study in @Nature https://t.co/jfppoguUlS
Love the idea in this paper mentioned @ULPsych meeting today https://t.co/n3PjSU1F8J