Title |
Multiplex Zymography Captures Stage-specific Activity Profiles of Cathepsins K, L, and S in Human Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-9-109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Binbin Chen, Manu O Platt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 34% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
Engineering | 11 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,175
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,238
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,839
of 117,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.