| Title |
The metabolic network of the last bacterial common ancestor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communications Biology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42003-021-01918-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joana C. Xavier, Rebecca E. Gerhards, Jessica L. E. Wimmer, Julia Brueckner, Fernando D. K. Tria, William F. Martin |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 6 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 62 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 62 | 49% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#156,971
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#131
of 5,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,766
of 430,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#10
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.