↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
75 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01425-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Fischer, Nicole D. S. Grunstra, Eva Zaffarini, Philipp Mitteroecker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Engineering 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#200,207
of 17,913,039 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#436
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,672
of 319,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#25
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,913,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 154.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.