| Title |
Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-021-01425-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Fischer, Nicole D. S. Grunstra, Eva Zaffarini, Philipp Mitteroecker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Austria | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 70% |
| Scientists | 16 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#349,729
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#657
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,423
of 456,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#20
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.