↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation for prognostic nomogram of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence based on circulating tumor cells and epithelial–mesenchymal transition

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Development and validation for prognostic nomogram of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence based on circulating tumor cells and epithelial–mesenchymal transition
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-86122-4
Authors

Jiani Yang, Jun Ma, Yue Jin, Shanshan Cheng, Shan Huang, Nan Zhang, Yu Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Design 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,568,942
of 18,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#69,291
of 101,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,954
of 323,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#35
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.