Title |
Fees delay pharmed drug
|
---|---|
Published by |
Nature, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1038/458951a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natasha Gilbert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 60% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2011.
All research outputs
#5,174,136
of 25,197,939 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#59,081
of 96,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,352
of 102,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#330
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,197,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.