↓ Skip to main content

A genome-wide association study identifies KIAA0350 as a type 1 diabetes gene

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
462 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
A genome-wide association study identifies KIAA0350 as a type 1 diabetes gene
Published in
Nature, July 2007
DOI 10.1038/nature06010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hakon Hakonarson, Struan F. A. Grant, Jonathan P. Bradfield, Luc Marchand, Cecilia E. Kim, Joseph T. Glessner, Rosemarie Grabs, Tracy Casalunovo, Shayne P. Taback, Edward C. Frackelton, Margaret L. Lawson, Luke J. Robinson, Robert Skraban, Yang Lu, Rosetta M. Chiavacci, Charles A. Stanley, Susan E. Kirsch, Eric F. Rappaport, Jordan S. Orange, Dimitri S. Monos, Marcella Devoto, Hui-Qi Qu, Constantin Polychronakos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 248 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 83 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 19 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 17%
Computer Science 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 32 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,215,372
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#34,992
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,056
of 82,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#62
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.