↓ Skip to main content

Endocytosis-dependent desensitization and protein synthesis–dependent resensitization in retinal growth cone adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Endocytosis-dependent desensitization and protein synthesis–dependent resensitization in retinal growth cone adaptation
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, January 2005
DOI 10.1038/nn1380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Piper, Saif Salih, Christine Weinl, Christine E Holt, William A Harris

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Researcher 24 22%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Neuroscience 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2005.
All research outputs
#15,674,939
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,675
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,794
of 141,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.