↓ Skip to main content

Even–odd carbon atom disparity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Even–odd carbon atom disparity
Published in
Nature, November 1996
DOI 10.1038/384320a0
Authors

Jagarlapudi A. R. P. Sarma, Ashwini Nangia, Gautam R. Desiraju, Engelbert Zass, Jack D. Dunitz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,747,805
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#44,227
of 79,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,435
of 193,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#579
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.